Play me a tiny violin

Here is a popular description of an excellent experiment (done by a colleague of mine at LAM, Paris 6). The attendant paper is C. Fritz, J. Curtin, J. Poitevineau, P. Morrel-Samuels, and F.-C. Tao, “Player preferences among new and old violins”, PNAS http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114999109. Surprisingly, this paper already has a Wikipedia page!

Of course, with conclusions like, “We found that (i) the most-preferred violin was new; (ii) the least-preferred was by Stradivari …” there is certain to be controversy. Here is a NY Times article containing criticism by a few professional musicians: that the tests were conducted in a hotel room and not a concert hall, that it takes time for a musician to get to know an instrument, and that quality varies among the instruments by great luthiers of history. I think the last two criticisms have more merit, but for the first, we can just say this study shows one should play million dollar violins in large reverberant spaces because in smaller rooms — the kind of space where the violin will spend most of its time resonating — they don’t sound as good (or play as well) as new more modestly priced instruments.

This article will provide an excellent example of experimental design for my course on the analysis and design of experiments this semester.

Advertisements

One thought on “Play me a tiny violin

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s